A shining star of wonderful gorgeousness

What I done this weekend, by English Mum aged 38 and 3/4: Bodies Dublin

Pic: Irish Times

So this weekend was darned exciting.  We had a little English family outing down to Dublin to see the Bodies Exhibition at the Ambassador Theatre with Jen, her son C and a couple of her nephews (I was going to say little nephews but they’re both about 15 foot tall – must be something in the water down there).

I’d read about it already and earmarked it as one to see after Glitter wrote about it a while ago.  As soon as we talked about it, Jen and I were of one mind, both being of the blood and guts/ ‘Bones’/serial-killer novel loving variety, we HAD to go.  But I know what you’re thinking: dead bodies, stripped of their skin and flayed open for all to see, it’s got to be puke-makingly gory, right?  Er well, no, actually, it’s suprisingly tame.  I mean, of course it’s realistic, because they’re real people (well, they were – and there’s a bit of controversy over exactly how they came to be dead in the first place, but that’s another story altogether), kind of plasticised and preserved forever.  What it is, undoubtedly, is highly educational.  Imagine how much easier your biology lesson would have been if you could have seen the heart/lungs/liver/whatever, displayed in 3D in front of your eyes.  The boys were completely riveted, and really enjoyed pointing out which of the bodies had smoked (‘ooh look, his lungs are black!’), and looking at the muscles, nerves and bones all displayed under glasss.  One exhibit showed just the blood vessels of the body and it was fascinating – feathery and ethereal.  Other highlights were the single leg, which looked disturbingly like belly pork in places, the individual hearts and lungs, and the babies, which I admit are not for everyone (there’s a warning before you go in).

The highlight for me was the body completely divided into slices in a similar way to an MRI scan.  Enthralling. 

So all-round, yes, I’d definitely recommend this exhibition as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to see just how beautiful, intricate and clever our bodies are on the inside.  My one moan was the merchandise – 40 quid for a t-shirt?  Come on.  Oh, hang on, two moans: you couldn’t take photos.  Why not, for goodness’ sake? – I’m hardly going to try and recreate it at home, although, on the other hand…

banner ad

29 Responses to “What I done this weekend, by English Mum aged 38 and 3/4: Bodies Dublin”

  1. Moon says:

    Sounds brilliant … and I agree about being able to see things like that. I was pretty good at biology, because it makes sense, and I can ‘see’.. Chemistry and physics was rubbish because it wasn’t ‘real’ to me …..

    I love the idea, and must go see….

  2. English Mum says:

    Moon: I’m the same – loved biology, couldn’t make head nor tail of the others. Hubby and #1 are maths and physics mad, and #2: well, he likes breaking stuff…

  3. Pamela says:

    What a fascinating experience! I had to laugh at your comment about the photo restriction and not re-creating the experience at home! I agree – the price of souvenirs at this type of exhibit is just outrageous. We went to the King Tut exhibit in 2007 and I would have loved to have had a few things to bring home but the prices were ridiculous. We settled for a mini sarcophagus that we use as a Christmas ornament – I know, it’s weird, but it’s a momento that reminds us every year of a great trip!

  4. Jennifer (Bert's No 1 Fan!) says:

    You make it sound so poetic I have to say, but sorry, no, still not convinced! I’m not squeamish and will watch surgery on the telly but I dunno, it’s just that they’re real. I didn’t know there were babies in the exhibition. Don’t think I could handle that at all. Good that you all enjoyed it though. It really is an excellent opportunity for students.

  5. Growup says:

    Haven’t got around to it yet. If you took photos you’d be impinging on their intellectual property rights (you could sell them and they wouldn’t get any kickback)

  6. Val says:

    I would have loved to go and see this….but:
    1. I’m too tight to pay to get in.
    2. No one would come with me.
    3. I’m glad I didn’t go if you aren’t allowed to take photos…..mean people.

  7. English Mum says:

    Pamela: Aw I wanted to go to that King Tut exhibition too. Well, at 20 quid a ticket I think I might have a go…if only Bert would sit still for long enough… :lol:

    Jenn: Yeh, the babies are in a side bit and there’s a notice telling you to take a moment before you go in. I thought it was fascinating tho – reminded me of the bits of bodies in jars at the Wellcome Museum I went to in London donkey’s years ago x

    Growup: However, you can just Google it and get a copy from one of the hundred of others who totally ignored the notice. Hee.

    Val: 1. We got a freebie (yay for Jen!), 2. Aw, I would’ve held your hand, and 3. Yup, buggers – you had to pay about a tenner for a brochure instead.

  8. Baino says:

    Sometimes the photo thing is more to do with flash damaging stuff. I’ve become very sneaky with hi ISO exposure so no flash! I saw it a while back in Sydney, mesmerising! Apparently more people want to ‘donate’ to the project than they need these days!

  9. Wee Jen says:

    Must go and see that – keep bloody forgetting when I’m in Dublin and then remember when we get home. Sounds fascinating though.

    On a side note, I could never see the point of David Boreanez until I watched Bones. Now I very,very much see the point ;-) *goes for a liedown in a dark room for some time*

  10. jennynib says:

    I must say that #2 displayed very highly evolved hand-eye co-ordination skills…

    When he dropped about 3,000 jelly beans down the leg of his trousers and we all had to scatter to grab them whilst simultaneously maintaining our dignified-in-the-presence-of-the-departed demeanour! Oh jeebus! How I did larf!!

    The babies were absolutely NOT my cup of tea. I accept that grown ups might want to (allegedly) donate their bodies to Science but little babies? It was almost unbearably sad.

    Jenn, don’t let squeamishness prevent you from attending. The exhibits are posed in an almost artful way and it’s very easy to deceive yourself as to their being real people.

    Not to be missed, skating on jelly beans notwithstanding… ;P

  11. I wanted to go and see this, but they wouldn’t let me in for free, even though I am an educator. So, being tight, I didn’t go. Mr. DBM, also an educator, did get in for free and thought it was fascinating. I have decided that I will leave my body to science and they might just want it since it is so crap that it is very interesting. Healthy bodies are just so boring.
    If you want to seet this without actually going, watch Casino Royal – Bond leaves a body for them in the exhibit – how thoughtful of him.

  12. Glitterkitty says:

    hiya EM – i’m glad you enjoyed the expo.. and being a scientist [microbiologist in fact!] by trade i really do appreciate the educational aspect of this.. and it was why i was v interested in going to see this when i first read about it
    as you saw in my little post.. i just made a decision not to go based on other stuff
    sounds like you had a good time tho!

  13. Natalie says:

    So EM…down to Dublin, you should hAve said, could have popped in for tea….I am quite normal…promise!!!!

  14. patty says:

    the exhibition was in St Louis Missouri last year and did a land office business, i believe it sold out everyday. Our library has a book about the exhibit and that was enought for me. find it just a little creepy that they look so natural, bodies with skin. not sure i would want to see up close and personal

  15. English Mum says:

    Baino: I’m definitely getting better with the camera, but it’s very dark in there and I was too scared to fiddle about with the macro setting and turning the flash off in case someone noticed the light – otherwise I might have had a sneaky go! I think some of the exhibits were a teeny bit too staged – the sports ones particularly – Hubby was of the opinion that is was slightly disrespectful to stage them with props, but then if people want to donate their body to be eternally catching a football, I suppose they should join the queue!

    Wee One: You’re so right. Bones has rocketed him up to my #1 spot – a disappointed Daniel Craig slipping down to second place :)

    Jen: Shite, I forgot the jelly bean story! For all those of you who missed the jelly bean skating: Jen bought the boys tubes of jelly beans, #2 tucked his (upside down, duh) into the waistband of his trousers and when he extracted it, the lid came off sending thousands of jelly beans whooshing down his trouser leg and out all over the floor. The flow was stopped by a simultaneous Jen/Hubby manoevre whereby Hubby picked him up and Jen held the bottom of his trousers closed. Classy.

  16. English Mum says:

    DBM: So he did, I’d forgotten about that. Hubby and I were talking about that last night – particularly about Glitter’s take on it that if the people didn’t give their permission there’s something not right about them not being able to rest in peace and instead travel the world as some kind of post-life performance. You should have gone though – you’d have liked it, I think. I want all my organs donated. Or compost me. I’m not bothered x

    Glitter: As above, I completely agree with some of your points. See, I suspected you were clever and I’ve been proved right :)

    Nats: Ah, but now I can navigate my way to O’Connell Street, we can meet up. You still owe me a trip to Avoca, remember?

    Patty: I can understand that completely, although it’s a lot less creepy and more..er…plasticky when you see it up close. Oh and welcome by the way!

  17. i thought that was a pic of jade goody

  18. English Mum says:

    Paddy: Tsk. You’ll get me hate mail!

  19. Moon says:

    So you are a fan of Sealy Booth then …. eh …. well, I have a huge thing for Bones, I could happily hang out the back of her !

  20. English Mum says:

    Moon: ‘happily hang out the back of her’? That conjures some very disturbing images!

  21. Taffy's Mum says:

    Sorry I stopped reading at the point Wee Jen mentioned David Boreneaz ……….(sorry dreaming again!)
    He has been my no 1 since playing Angel in Buffy the Vampire Slayer!

  22. English Mum says:

    TM: Isn’t he gorgeous? *sigh* :lol:

  23. Ruth E says:

    I saw the Gunther Von Hagen exhibit Body Worlds in Chicago – absolutely fascinating!

  24. Moon says:

    He is a good looking guy … I’m not gay or ought, but he is a looker .. Still not sure who I would chose over Bones or Dr Cuddy from House … tough choice, and I know they are waiting on my decision ….

  25. English Mum says:

    Ruth: Harro! Will have to google that one – sounds similar tho x

    Moon: I’ve still never seen that House. I think I can feel a ‘top ten’ post coming on!

  26. Taffy's Mum says:

    House is brilliant – although I am sure they must be running out of conditions for him to treat!

    It seems wierd watching Hugh Laurie in re-runs of Blackadder as I have got so used to him with an American accent and a limp!

  27. English Mum says:

    TM: Is his accent any good though? I suppose it must be, seeing as nobody’s making Dick Van Dyke references :) Ooh, and I sent you a red nose on FB you lucky beaver x

  28. Taffy's Mum says:

    His accent is good – his character is hilarious. Just as you think you can predict his reaction to something he will do something totally different.

    Thanks for the red nose – I will go and collect it now! xx

  29. K8 says:

    I’m going at the end of the week, I can’t wait. I’m glad I have nursey friends and people like you who don’t think I’m a freak for being curious :o )

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Copyright 2008 - 2009 English Mum | Powered by Wordpress | Designed by ADD Creative